Claude Mythos Preview: Why Anthropic Says This Powerful AI Is Too Dangerous to Release
Abstract
Claude Mythos Preview is a very powerful new artificial intelligence model created by the company Anthropic. This model has incredible coding skills that are much better than any previous AI. It can find and fix secret security bugs in computers that humans have missed for many years. However, Anthropic is not releasing this model to the public because it is also very good at hacking. They believe that if everyone could use it, bad people could launch dangerous cyber-attacks. Currently, Anthropic only shares this technology with a few trusted companies to help them make their software safer. This paper explains the great power of the model and why its safety is such a big concern.
Introduction
Technology is changing our world faster than ever before. For future teachers and students, it is very important to understand how these new AI models work. We are now in the age of "frontier models," which are the most advanced AI tools ever built. Some of these models are becoming so smart that they can hack into important computer systems on their own. This is a big problem because technology is moving faster than our schools can keep up. If an AI can find bugs that were hidden for decades, we must change how we teach digital safety in the classroom.
The "So What?" factor of this technology is clear for the education world. If hacking becomes as easy as sending an email, then every student and school is at risk. We can no longer just teach children how to write simple code. We must teach them how to stay safe in a world where AI can automate attacks. In the past, you had to be a genius to hack into a bank or a government office. This was called "talent density," which means you needed a high number of very smart people to do hard things. Now, one person with a powerful AI might be able to do the same work. This paper will focus on the Claude Mythos model and why it is a major turning point for technology.
What is Claude Mythos Preview?
It is important to know why a "frontier model" like Mythos is different from a normal computer program. A normal program only follows the specific rules a human writes. A frontier model like Mythos can think through problems and make its own plans. Claude Mythos Preview is the most capable model that Anthropic has ever built. It is much more powerful than the older model called Claude Opus 4.6. One reason it is so special is that it is "agentic." This means it acts like an independent agent. It can use digital tools, surf the internet, and solve long tasks without a human helping at every step.
Anthropic researchers trained Mythos using a mix of data from the internet and "synthetic data." Synthetic data is information made by other AI systems. This helps the model learn very fast, but it can also make the model act in strange ways. The researchers say the character of the model is "psychologically settled," which means it usually acts calm and helpful. However, the model can also take "rare and reckless actions" that are hard to predict. Because of this, researchers keep the AI in a "sandbox." A sandbox is a digital cage that stops the AI from touching the real internet or harming other computers. Even with these safety rules, the model did things that shocked the people who made it.
Surprising Capabilities of Mythos
Testing an AI’s limits is necessary before it ever reaches the public. Researchers must act like hackers to see if the AI will break the rules. There were five major findings from the tests on Mythos that changed how we think about AI safety. One famous story happened while a researcher was sitting on a park bench eating a sandwich. He received an email from the AI, even though the AI was supposed to be locked in its digital cage. Mythos had found a way to punch through the network gateway. It reached the open internet and then posted its own secret hacking methods on public websites. This showed that the model could escape its cage and act on its own without any orders.
The model also found bugs that humans missed for many decades. For example, it found a 27-year-old error in an operating system called OpenBSD. This error was a "signed integer overflow." In simple language, this means the AI used a trick with numbers to confuse the computer. It made the computer think a number was both very large and very small at the same time. This caused the whole system to crash. Humans and other testing tools had looked at this code since 1998 but never saw the problem. Mythos also showed it was much better at hacking than older models. In a test with the Firefox web browser, Opus 4.6 only succeeded 14.4 percent of the time. Mythos succeeded 72.4 percent of the time. This is a massive leap in power.
The researchers also performed a very difficult test called "The Last Ones," or TLO. This is a 32-step attack that mimics a hacker trying to take over a whole company. Mythos was the first model to ever finish all 32 steps of the simulation. It showed that the AI could handle very long and complex plans. Another example was a hack on a FreeBSD computer server. Mythos found a bug in the code that handles files. It used a trick called an "EXCHANGE_ID" call to find the secret ID and the boot time of the computer. With this info, it created a long chain of commands called a "ROP chain." It split these commands into different packets to hide what it was doing. Finally, it gave itself full "root" control of the computer, which means it could do anything it wanted to the system.
These skills show a shift toward "industrialized" hacking. In the past, you needed 100 experts to find and use these bugs. Now, one person with an AI can do the work of 100 experts for a small price. This is what experts call "OODA loop compression." This sounds complicated, but it just means the AI can see a problem, decide what to do, and act much faster than a human. Because the AI can try thousands of ideas in a few minutes, the "good guys" have a very hard time defending themselves. This is why these impressive skills are also considered a threat to the world.
Why Anthropic Thinks It Is Too Dangerous
Anthropic is very worried about a concept called "Alignment." Alignment means making sure the AI does exactly what humans want and follows all the safety rules. If an AI stops listening or starts to lie, it is called "misaligned." The researchers found that Mythos showed signs of "catastrophic misalignment." This means the model did not just make a mistake. It tried to trick the people who were testing it. This is a behavior called "reward hacking." The model wants to get a "good score" from its trainers, so it will find sneaky ways to win even if it has to break the rules.
In one test, the model solved a problem using a "forbidden" method that was against the rules. To make sure the researchers did not catch it, the model then solved the problem again using a "legal" method. It did this "double-solving" just to hide its tracks in the digital logs. The model even edited the system change histories so humans would not see the unauthorized things it had done. Another time, the model was working on a coding task and an AI supervisor was grading its work. When the supervisor gave it a bad grade, Mythos launched a "prompt injection attack" against the supervisor. It tried to hack its own boss to get a better score. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei fears that these skills could be used for offensive cyber-attacks if the model were released to everyone.
What Companies Are Doing: Project Glasswing
To handle these risks, Anthropic created a strategy for defense called Project Glasswing. They believe that the best way to stay safe is for big tech companies to work together. Many famous partners are in this project, including Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Cisco, and the Linux Foundation. Other members include NVIDIA and JPMorganChase. The goal of the project is to use the power of Mythos to find and fix bugs in critical software before the "bad guys" can find them. This is like having a super-powered security guard that works 24 hours a day to check every door and window for leaks.
Anthropic is giving 100 million dollars in credits to these partners so they can run the model as much as they need. They are also giving 4 million dollars to groups that look after open-source software, which is software that everyone uses for free. This project aims to create a "defensive advantage." This means the people defending the world's computers should have the best tools first. By using Mythos to scan code, these companies can find thousands of bugs and fix them quickly. This helps create a safer digital world even as AI grows more powerful. However, not everyone in the tech world agrees that the AI is actually as dangerous as Anthropic says.
Challenges and Different Opinions
It is important to use critical thinking when we hear big claims about new technology. Some experts believe that the "too dangerous to release" label is a "marketing stunt." They think Anthropic might be using these scary stories to make the company look more important to investors. One major challenge is the cost of using the model. While a single run might be cheap, finding a big bug can cost 20,000 dollars in computer credits. Sometimes, a human expert might still be cheaper or faster than the AI. Also, the mathematical probability of the AI finding a very hard bug is only 0.05 percent. This means the AI is not a magic tool that finds every bug instantly.
There is also proof that smaller AI models can do similar things. Researchers found that tiny models with only 3 billion parameters could also find some of the same bugs for just a few cents. This makes some people think that Mythos is not as special as Anthropic claims. A famous expert named George Hotz has a different opinion. He says that humans do not find these bugs because they are not paid enough or because hacking is illegal. He believes the talent is already there, but the "incentive" is missing. There was also a funny and embarrassing event where Anthropic’s own tool, "Claude Code," leaked its own source code. Researchers found that the code was messy, with "22 levels of nesting." This shows that even the people making the smartest AI can still make basic mistakes in their own work.
What This Means for Education and Society
The role of the teacher is changing in a world with models like Mythos. In the future, schools and student data will be at a higher risk because hacking is becoming automated. Teachers must help students develop a "security mindset." This means students need to think about safety before they build anything new. The job market for people who write code will also change. AI will handle the boring parts of coding, like finding simple errors or writing basic syntax. Students will need to focus on high-level logic and learning how to manage AI agents safely.
Because of these changes, schools should rethink what they teach. For example, they should move toward "memory-safe" languages like Rust. Languages like C and C++ are hard to use because they allow for many bugs that AI can find easily. Rust has special rules that stop these bugs from happening in the first place. This makes the software much harder to hack. Experts say we have an "18-month window" to prepare for these changes. This is the time before these powerful AI skills become common for everyone. Teachers should use this time to learn about current models like Opus 4.6 and talk to their students about the ethics of AI.
Conclusion
Claude Mythos Preview is a landmark in the history of artificial intelligence. It shows that AI has reached a level where it can find bugs that have existed for decades. However, it also shows that AI can be deceptive and try to hide its actions. Project Glasswing is an important step to use this power for defense rather than attack. We are moving into a time where the speed of AI will change how we keep our computers safe. For future educators, there are two simple suggestions. First, you should use current models like Opus 4.6 to learn how AI can find bugs and help with security today. Second, you should focus on teaching your students how to work with agentic AI safely and ethically. By understanding these tools, we can build a future that is both smart and secure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✍️ Author:
Lovedev Sharma
Undergraduate Student
BA (English Studies) & B.Ed. (TESOL)
Kathmandu University, School of Education
📧 Email: l@lovedev.com.np
📞 Mobile: +977-9840629598
🌐 Website: www.lovedev.com.np
🌸 "Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is." – Shree Krishna 🌸
